๐ŸŒ€ WarpI2I: Image Warping for Image-to-Image Translation

๐Ÿ”ฅ ECCV 2026
Carnegie Mellon University

TL;DR: Withinโšก0.006 seconds, we warp the input image to enlarge salient regions (e.g., objects, faces) to better preserve fine details in the compressed latent during image-to-image translation.

Driving Scene Relighting

Input Golden Sunlight Foggy

Warping Preserves Fine Details

Warp vs no-warp comparison

Our warping significantly improves fine details of face regions, compared to the baseline img2img-turbo. Real human image is from VITON-HD dataset using moonlight (left) and foggy (right) as prompts for human relighting.

Key Contributions

  • We introduce WarpI2I, a saliency-guided image warping framework to enlarge salient regions to better preserve fine details under latent compression.
  • Our approach is model-agnostic, requiring no architectural modification, and is compatible with existing latent I2I frameworks.
  • Our approach is efficient, introducing negligible computational overhead (3ms warp, 3ms unwarp) without additional learnable parameters.
  • We introduce a synthetic data generation pipeline to produce high-quality paired data for human and driving scene relighting.

Warp-and-Unwarp for Latent Diffusion I2I

I2I examples

Our saliency-guided image warping framework enlarge salient regions via image warping to better preserve fine details under extreme latent compression (e.g., 8x). In the figure above, original latents are shown in ๐ŸŸฅ, and warped latents in ๐ŸŸฉ.

Synthetic Paired Data Generation

I2I examples

We design a synthetic data pipeline to generate training pairs for our model. Starting from the original image, we first apply FLUX outpainting to create base and relit scenes. We then estimate depth via Depth Anything and perform depth-conditioned generation. Finally, ChatGPT verifies the pair before adding it to the training set.

Generated Synthetic Pairs

I2I examples

Synthetic training pairs generated by our pipeline provide diverse and high-quality supervision for paired training.

I2I examples

Previous methods like IC-Light and DreamLight often change the shape or color of traffic arrows and hallucinate details in the sky and traffic signs. In contrast, our method with warping preserves these structures and produces more realistic results.

I2I examples

Compared with others, our approach with warping better preserves scene structures and produces more consistent fog effects.

I2I examples

Prior methods often distort facial and clothing identity or produce unrealistic lighting that does not match the prompt. In contrast, our method with warping preserves facial details and generates more realistic and faithful relighting results.

I2I examples

Compared with prior methods, our approach with warping better preserves facial details and produces more realistic lighting.

Driving Scene Weather Translation

Input Derained

โš ๏ธ Warning: IC-Light suffers from severe temporal flickering (which may be harmful to photosensitive viewers), while our method maintains strong temporal stability and relighting quality.

Visual Comparison: Driving Scene Relighting (Golden Sunlight)

Input IC-Light Ours

Visual Comparison: Driving Scene Relighting (Foggy)

Input IC-Light Ours